Home › Upcoming votes › Coherent Corp.
Read the proxy statement on EDGARCoherent Corp.: past votes
As listed in Coherent Corp.’s proxy statement, with the board’s recommendation on each item. The company has filed 1 set of additional materials since; they can add to or change what is below, so check them before relying on it.
| # | Item | Proposed by | Board recommends | Last year (same kind of item) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Director election |
Board | For | — |
| 2 | NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPANY'S 2026 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION Say on pay |
Board | For | 97% support |
| 3 | RATIFICATION OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE'S SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Auditor |
Board | For | 99.0% support |
From Coherent Corp.’s Form 8-K, filed November 17, 2025, for the meeting held November 13, 2025 (read it on EDGAR). Support is the share of votes cast that were FOR: abstentions and broker non-votes are left out.
| Item | Support (of votes cast) | Reported outcome |
|---|---|---|
| David L. Motley | 99.1% | — |
| Lisa Neal-Graves | 90% | — |
| Shaker Sadasivam | 99% | — |
| Michelle Sterling | 99% | — |
| At the Annual Meeting, the Company's shareholders approved (on a non-binding advisory basis) the Company's executive compensation of named e | 97% | Approved |
| At the Annual Meeting, the Company's shareholders ratified the selection by the Audit and Risk Committee of the Company's Board of Directors | 99.0% | Approved |
The five managers that reported the most shares voted at Coherent Corp.’s November 13, 2025 meeting, from their Form N-PX filings. This is how they voted then; it says nothing about how they will vote this time. Every manager’s vote.
| Item | Fidelity | Vanguard | Invesco | BlackRock | Wellington |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At the Annual Meeting, the Company's shareholders approved (on a non-binding advisory basis) the Company's executive com | For | For | For | For | For |
| At the Annual Meeting, the Company's shareholders ratified the selection by the Audit and Risk Committee of the Company' | For | For | For | For | — |
| Election of the Class Two Directors nominated by the Board of Directors for a three-year term to expire at the annual me | For | For | For | For | — |
| Election of the Class Two Directors nominated by the Board of Directors for a three-year term to expire at the annual me | For | For | For | For | — |
| Election of the Class Two Directors nominated by the Board of Directors for a three-year term to expire at the annual me | For | For | Against | For | — |
| Election of the Class Two Directors nominated by the Board of Directors for a three-year term to expire at the annual me | For | For | For | For | — |
| Election of the Class Two Directors nominated by the Board of Directors for a three-year term to expire at the annual me | For | For | For | For | — |
The meeting facts and ballot come from the SEC proxy filings listed above. Ballots are read from the filing automatically and checked against the proxy’s own item count and voting card; when that check does not pass, the page shows “see the proxy statement” instead of a ballot. Last year’s figures are the company’s official Form 8-K results and the managers’ Form N-PX reports. Nothing on this page predicts how any shareholder will vote, and it is not investment advice. How this works.