BB SEGURIDADE PARTICIPACOES SA 2024-2025 Proxy Voting Records

The 45 asset managers below reported 19,909,254 for, 36,146,903 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 45 asset managers. All 45 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 45 asset managers below reported 54,707,675 for, 1,348,482 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 45 asset managers. All 45 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 45 asset managers below reported 19,899,366 for, 36,156,791 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 45 asset managers. All 45 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 45 asset managers below reported 55,852,058 for, 201,899 against, 2,200 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 45 asset managers. All 45 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: As an Ordinary Shareholder, Would You like to Request a Separate Minority Election of a Member of the Board of Directors, Under the Terms of Article 141 of the Brazilian Corporate Law?

The 38 asset managers below reported 1,760,477 against, 52,272,537 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: Do You Wish to Adopt Cumulative Voting for the Election of the Members of the Board of Directors, Under the Terms of Article 141 of the Brazilian Corporate Law?

The 38 asset managers below reported 17,018,994 against, 37,014,020 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 16,481,999 for, 37,551,015 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 16,481,999 for, 37,551,015 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 16,481,999 for, 37,551,015 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 54,033,014 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 54,033,014 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: Percentage of Votes to Be Assigned - Elect Gilberto Lourenco da Aparecida as Independent Director (Appointed by Banco do Brasil)

The 38 asset managers below reported 54,033,014 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 54,033,014 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 54,033,014 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 54,033,014 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: Percentage of Votes to Be Assigned - Elect Maria Carolina Ferreira Lacerda as Independent Director as Minority Representative Under Majority Board Election

The 38 asset managers below reported 54,033,014 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 54,033,014 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST A SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 141, PARAGRAPH 4, I, OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976 THE SHAREHOLDER CAN ONLY FILL THIS FIELD IN CASE OF KEEPING THE POSITION OF VOTING SHARES ININTERRUPTED FOR 3 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE GENERAL MEETING. IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES NO OR ABSTAIN, HISHER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF A SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The 14 asset managers below reported 376,354 for, 161,800 against, 21,179,698 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST THE CUMULATIVE VOTING FOR THE ELECTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, UNDER THE TERMS OF ART. 141 OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976 IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES NO OR ABSTAIN, HISHER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF THE CUMULATIVE VOTING REQUEST

The 14 asset managers below reported 430,782 for, 197,100 against, 21,089,970 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: PROPOSAL ON NET PROFIT ALLOTMENT REGARDING THE FISCAL YEAR OF 2024, AS FOLLOWS AMOUNTS IN R NET INCOME 8,703,352,915.39 ACCUMULATED INCOME LOSSES 25,943.08 ADJUSTED NET INCOME1 8,268,185,269.62 LEGAL RESERVE 435,167,645.77 COMPENSATION TO THE SHAREHOLDERS 7,111,000,000.00 INTEREST ON OWN CAPITAL DIVIDENDS 7,111,000,000.00 USE OF THE RESERVE FOR EQUALIZATION OF DIVIDENDS STATUTORY RESERVES FOR CAPITAL REINFORCEMENT FOR EQUALIZATION OF CAPITAL REMUNERATION..1,157,185,269.62 1 OBTAINED BY REDUCING THE NET INCOME FOR THE YEAR BY THE AMOUNT APPLIED IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE LEGAL RESERVE

The 14 asset managers below reported 21,717,852 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 39 asset managers below reported 54,131,314 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 39 asset managers. All 39 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 39 asset managers below reported 54,131,314 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 39 asset managers. All 39 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 39 asset managers below reported 54,131,314 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 39 asset managers. All 39 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 39 asset managers below reported 54,131,314 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 39 asset managers. All 39 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 39 asset managers below reported 54,131,314 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 39 asset managers. All 39 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: THE PROPOSAL TO SET THE GLOBAL AMOUNT FOR PAYMENT OF FEES AND BENEFITS FOR MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS, FROM APRIL 2025 TO MARCH 2026, AT A MAXIMUM OF R 11,729,289.46 ELEVEN MILLION, SEVEN HUNDRED AND TWENTYNINE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTYNINE REAIS AND FORTYSIX CENTS

The 14 asset managers below reported 20,497,517 for, 1,220,335 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 38 asset managers below reported 54,011,832 for, 21,182 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 54,033,014 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 53,798,014 for, 235,000 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: IN CASE OF A CUMULATIVE VOTING PROCESS, SHOULD THE CORRESPONDING VOTES TO YOUR SHARES BE EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE CANDIDATES THAT YOUVE CHOSEN IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES YES AND ALSO INDICATES THE APPROVE ANSWER TYPE FOR SPECIFIC CANDIDATES AMONG THOSE LISTED BELOW, THEIR VOTES WILL BE DISTRIBUTED PROPORTIONALLY AMONG THESE CANDIDATES. IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES TO ABSTAIN AND THE ELECTION OCCURS BY THE CUMULATIVE VOTING PROCESS, THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE SHALL BE COUNTED AS AN ABSTENTION IN THE RESPECTIVE RESOLUTION OF THE MEETING

The 14 asset managers below reported 376,354 for, 493,356 against, 20,848,142 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 38 managers: 19,798,568 for, 34,234,446 against. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,997,029 against.

The 38 asset managers below reported 53,798,014 for, 235,000 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 53,798,014 for, 235,000 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 53,683,214 for, 349,800 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 53,798,014 for, 235,000 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: THE PROPOSAL TO SET THE INDIVIDUAL MONTHLY REMUNERATION OF THE INDEPENDENT MEMBER OF THE RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS COMMITTEE AT 16.71 OF THE AVERAGE MONTHLY REMUNERATION RECEIVED BY MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD, INCLUDING THE CHRISTMAS BONUS AND EXCLUDING OTHER BENEFITS, FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL2025 TO MARCH2026

The 14 asset managers below reported 21,717,852 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: THE PROPOSAL TO SET THE INDIVIDUAL MONTHLY REMUNERATION OF THE MEMBERS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AT 16.71 OF THE AVERAGE MONTHLY REMUNERATION RECEIVED BY MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD, INCLUDING THE CHRISTMAS BONUS, AND EXCLUDING THE OTHER BENEFITS, FOR THE PERIOD APRIL2025 TO MARCH2026

The 14 asset managers below reported 21,717,852 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: THE PROPOSAL TO SET THE INDIVIDUAL MONTHLY REMUNERATION OF THE MEMBERS OF THE RISK AND CAPITAL COMMITTEE AT 16.71 OF THE AVERAGE MONTHLY REMUNERATION RECEIVED BY MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD, INCLUDING THE CHRISTMAS BONUS, AND EXCLUDING OTHER BENEFITS, FOR THE PERIOD APRIL2025 TO MARCH2026

The 14 asset managers below reported 21,717,852 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: THE PROPOSAL TO SET THE MONTHLY FEES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AT 10 OF THE AVERAGE MONTHLY REMUNERATION RECEIVED BY MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD, INCLUDING THE CHRISTMAS BONUS, AND EXCLUDING OTHER BENEFITS, FOR THE PERIOD APRIL2025 TO MARCH2026

The 14 asset managers below reported 21,717,852 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: THE PROPOSAL TO SET THE MONTHLY FEES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE FISCAL COUNCIL AT 10 OF THE AVERAGE MONTHLY REMUNERATION RECEIVED BY MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD, INCLUDING THE CHRISTMAS BONUS AND EXCLUDING OTHER BENEFITS, FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL2025 TO MARCH2026

The 14 asset managers below reported 21,717,852 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.