Ferroglobe PLC 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

The 50 asset managers below reported 19,854,927 for, 208,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. All 50 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 50 asset managers below reported 19,854,927 for, 208,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. All 50 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 50 asset managers below reported 19,844,939 for, 218,154 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. All 50 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 50 asset managers below reported 19,854,927 for, 208,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. All 50 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 50 asset managers below reported 19,854,927 for, 208,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. All 50 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 50 asset managers below reported 19,854,927 for, 208,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. All 50 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 50 asset managers below reported 19,469,668 for, 593,425 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. All 50 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 50 asset managers below reported 19,854,927 for, 208,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. All 50 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 50 asset managers below reported 19,854,927 for, 208,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 50 asset managers. All 50 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 47 asset managers below reported 18,571,902 for, 10,627 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 47 asset managers. All 47 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 47 asset managers below reported 18,571,902 for, 10,627 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 47 asset managers. All 47 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 3 asset managers below reported 1,273,037 for, 207,527 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 2 asset managers below reported 827,591 for, 207,527 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 34 asset managers below reported 12,986,859 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 34 asset managers below reported 12,986,859 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: THAT, under Part 14 of the Companies Act, replacing prior authorities, the Company and all its subsidiaries may (i) donate to political parties or independent candidates (ii) donate to political organizations other than parties (iii) incur political expenditure, as defined by the Act provided total donations/expenditure in each category do not in aggregate exceed £100,000 by the Company or subsidiaries This authority ends at the close of the next annual meeting Currency sums may be converted at a Board-chosen rate.

The 16 asset managers below reported 7,076,234 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Authority for certain donations and expenditure: THAT, in accordance with Part 14 of the Companies Act and in substitution for any previous authorities given to the Company (and its subsidiaries), the Company (and all companies that are subsidiary of the Company at any time during the period for which this resolution has effect) be authorized to: (i) make political donations to political parties or independent election candidates; (ii) make political donations to political organizations other than political parties, and (iii) incur political expenditure, in each case, as such terms are defined in the Companies Act, provided that with respect to each of the foregoing categories, any such donations or expenditure made by the Company, or a subsidiary of the Company, do not in the aggregate exceed PS100,000. Such authority shall expire at the conclusion of the Company's next annual general meeting. For the purposes of this resolution, the authorized sum may comprise sums in different currencies that shall be converted at such rate as the Board may in its absolute discretion determine to be appropriate.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: THAT the directors' annual report on remuneration for the financial year ended December 31, 2025 (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, any part of the Directors' remuneration report containing the directors' remuneration policy), as set out on pages 40 to 42 and 51 to 61 of the U.K. Annual Report and Accounts be approved.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 17 managers: 5,899,289 for, 1,291,548 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 33 managers: 12,901,951 for, 9,461,925 against. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

The 35 asset managers below reported 3,960,257 for, 7,189,767 against, 1,841,788 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 35 asset managers. All 35 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: Directors' remuneration: THAT the directors' annual report on remuneration for the financial year ended December 31, 2025 (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, any part of the Directors' remuneration report containing the directors' remuneration policy), as set out on pages 40 to 42 and 51 to 61 of the U.K. Annual Report and Accounts be approved.

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,620,450 for, 1,737,186 against, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 34 asset managers below reported 12,986,859 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 34 asset managers below reported 12,986,859 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: THAT KPMG LLP be re-appointed as auditor of the Company to hold office from the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting until the conclusion of the next general meeting at which accounts are laid before the Company.

The 16 asset managers below reported 6,868,068 for, 208,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 16 asset managers below reported 6,868,068 for, 208,166 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: THAT the directors' and auditor's reports and the accounts of the Company for the financial year ended December 31, 2025 (the "U.K. Annual Report and Accounts") be received.

The 15 asset managers below reported 7,075,595 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Re-appointment of Auditor: THAT KPMG LLP be re-appointed as auditor of the Company to hold office from the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting until the conclusion of the next general meeting at which accounts are laid before the Company.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: U.K. Annual Report and Accounts 2025: THAT the directors' and auditor's reports and the accounts of the Company for the financial year ended December 31, 2025 (the "U.K. Annual Report and Accounts") be received.

The 8 asset managers below reported 3,357,636 for, 6,372 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.