LOCALIZA RENT A CAR SA 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 139,447,145 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 6,220,855 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 139,447,145 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 6,220,855 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 118,237,312 for, 21,075,166 against, 134,667 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 8,787,227 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 21,075,166 for, 118,371,979 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 2,950 for, 6,217,905 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Maria Aparecida Metanias Hallack as Fiscal Council Member and Carolina Luiza Ferreira Antunes Campos De Senna as Alternate

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 134,667 for, 21,075,166 against, 118,237,312 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 2,569,322 for, 6,217,905 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES TO THE FISCAL COUNCIL THE SHAREHOLDER MAY NOMINATE AS MANY CANDIDATES AS THERE ARE SEATS TO BE FILLED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. LIMIT OF VACANCIES 3: ANTONIO DE PADUA SOARES POLICARPO MARCIO JOSE SOARES LUTTERBACH

The 12 asset managers below reported 9,680,336 for, 9,927 abstained, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 11,014,715 for, 16,908 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 4,503,673 for, 6,527,950 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 11,031,623 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 16,908 for, 11,014,715 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 6,527,950 for, 4,503,673 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 11,031,623 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES TO THE FISCAL COUNCIL THE SHAREHOLDER MAY NOMINATE AS MANY CANDIDATES AS THERE ARE SEATS TO BE FILLED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. LIMIT OF VACANCIES 3: CARLA ALESSANDRA TREMATORE EDER CARVALHO MAGALHAES

The 9 asset managers below reported 7,824,153 for, 9,927 abstained, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 138,460,753 for, 178,772 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 6,218,468 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 138,460,753 for, 178,772 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 6,218,468 for.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVE CHANGES TO THE HEADING OF ARTICLE 3, THE HEADING OF ARTICLE 5, ITEM M OF ARTICLE 12, THE HEADING, PARAGRAPHS, AND ITEMS OF ARTICLE 21, THE ITEMS OF ARTICLE 22, AND ITEM A OF PARAGRAPH 2 OF ARTICLE 26 OF THE COMPANYS BYLAWS

The 12 asset managers below reported 9,690,263 for, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVE THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COMPANYS BYLAWS

The 12 asset managers below reported 9,690,263 for, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 9,661,712 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 9,661,712 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 139,447,145 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 16,705,842 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 139,447,145 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 6,218,468 for.

Description as filed by funds: DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS TO COMPOSE THE FISCAL COUNCIL AT 3 THREE

The 12 asset managers below reported 9,690,263 for, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FISCAL COUNCIL, UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 161 OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976 IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES NO OR ABSTAIN, HISHER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FISCAL COUNCIL

The 12 asset managers below reported 9,690,263 for, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 9,661,712 for, 11,014,715 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 11,031,623 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 108,151,599 for, 31,295,546 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 6,218,468 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 139,447,145 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 8,397,618 for.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVE THE MANAGEMENTS PROPOSAL FOR THE ALLOCATION OF THE PROFIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023, AND THE DIVIDEND DISTRIBUTION

The 12 asset managers below reported 9,690,263 for, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 11,031,623 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 11,031,623 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: In the Event of a Second Call, Can the Voting Instructions Contained in this Proxy Card Be Considered Valid for the Second Call?

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 138,314,544 for, 1,134,986 against, 178,772 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 6,218,468 for.

Description as filed by funds: IF A SECOND CALL IS REQUIRED FOR THE AGM, CAN THE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS CONTAINED IN THIS FORM ALSO BE CONSIDERED IN THE EVENT OF HOLDING THE AGM ON SECOND CALL

The 12 asset managers below reported 7,803,364 for, 1,886,899 against, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: IF A SECOND CALL IS REQUIRED FOR THE EGM, CAN THE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS CONTAINED IN THIS FORM ALSO BE CONSIDERED IN THE EVENT OF HOLDING THE EGM ON SECOND CALL

The 12 asset managers below reported 9,659,547 for, 30,716 against, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 139,447,145 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 16,608,102 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 139,255,066 for, 192,079 against. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 6,220,855 for.

Description as filed by funds: DETERMINE THE TOTAL ANNUAL MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION

The 12 asset managers below reported 9,680,336 for, 9,927 abstained, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 11,031,623 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 9 asset managers below reported 11,031,623 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVE THE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTS, AND THE MANAGEMENT REPORT, AND THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023, ALONG WITH THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT AND THE OPINION OF THE FISCAL COUNCIL

The 12 asset managers below reported 9,690,263 for, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DETERMINE THE COMPENSATION OF THE FISCAL COUNCIL

The 12 asset managers below reported 9,437,744 for, 252,519 abstained, 3,442,513 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.