Ring Energy, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Anthony B. Petrelli

Ring Energy, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Anthony B. Petrelli”): 60,976,493 for, 21,524,541 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors Each of the seven nominees for director was duly elected by the Company's stockholders, with votes as follows:”
Support: 74% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 12 asset managers below reported 21,398,119 for, 962 withheld, 32,288 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Carla T. Tharp

Ring Energy, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Carla Tharp”): 64,753,068 for, 17,747,966 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors Each of the seven nominees for director was duly elected by the Company's stockholders, with votes as follows:”
Support: 78% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 12 asset managers below reported 15,118,241 for, 6,312,990 withheld, 139 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: David S. Habachy

Ring Energy, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: David A. Habachy”): 73,308,126 for, 9,192,908 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors Each of the seven nominees for director was duly elected by the Company's stockholders, with votes as follows:”
Support: 89% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 12 asset managers below reported 21,398,217 for, 962 withheld, 32,190 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: John A. Crum

Ring Energy, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: John A. Crum”): 61,576,650 for, 20,924,384 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors Each of the seven nominees for director was duly elected by the Company's stockholders, with votes as follows:”
Support: 75% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 12 asset managers below reported 21,398,124 for, 962 withheld, 32,283 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Paul D. McKinney

Ring Energy, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Paul D. McKinney”): 71,414,643 for, 11,086,391 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors Each of the seven nominees for director was duly elected by the Company's stockholders, with votes as follows:”
Support: 87% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 12 asset managers below reported 21,398,203 for, 962 withheld, 32,204 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Richard E. Harris

Ring Energy, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Richard E. Harris”): 61,205,691 for, 21,295,343 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors Each of the seven nominees for director was duly elected by the Company's stockholders, with votes as follows:”
Support: 74% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 12 asset managers below reported 21,398,121 for, 962 withheld, 32,286 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Thomas L. Mitchell

Ring Energy, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Thomas L. Mitchell”): 61,715,336 for, 20,785,698 withheld, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors Each of the seven nominees for director was duly elected by the Company's stockholders, with votes as follows:”
Support: 75% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + WITHHELD); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 12 asset managers below reported 21,398,125 for, 962 withheld, 32,282 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.

Ring Energy, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation”): 61,088,330 for, 17,921,972 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2 - Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation The stockholders approved, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, by the following vote:”
Support: 77% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 13 managers: 21,484,568 for, 141 against, 27 abstained.

Institutional-manager reports, all 78 managers: 20,418,933 for, 145,771 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP AS THE COMPANY'S AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2026.

Ring Energy, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“3. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”): 136,514,060 for, 4,970,927 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 3 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The stockholders ratified the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026 by the following vote:”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 13 asset managers below reported 21,484,715 for, 14 against, 6 abstained.