TIM SA 2024-2025 Proxy Voting Records

The 34 asset managers below reported this as one line covering every nominee; it is not attributed to any one director, and no share total is shown for it.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 34 asset managers below reported 99,499,350 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: As an Ordinary Shareholder, Would You Like to Request a Separate Election of a Member of the Fiscal Council, Under the Terms of Article 161 of the Brazilian Corporate Law?

The 27 asset managers below reported 54,009,883 against, 42,768,585 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: As an Ordinary Shareholder, Would You like to Request a Separate Minority Election of a Member of the Board of Directors, Under the Terms of Article 141 of the Brazilian Corporate Law?

The 27 asset managers below reported 54,009,883 against, 42,768,585 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 43,141,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 171,000 against, 42,970,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 171,000 against, 42,970,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 171,000 against, 42,970,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 171,000 against, 42,970,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 171,000 against, 42,970,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 171,000 against, 42,970,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 171,000 against, 42,970,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 171,000 against, 42,970,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 171,000 against, 42,970,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 171,000 against, 42,970,412 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 13 asset managers below reported 30,327,254 for, 140,118 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 12 asset managers below reported 25,408,934 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 12 asset managers below reported 25,408,934 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 12 asset managers below reported 25,408,934 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To resolve on the proposal for the extension of the Cooperation and Support Agreement, through the execution of its 18th amendment, to be entered into between Telecom Italia S.p.A., on the one hand, and the Company, on the other hand

The 13 asset managers below reported 31,926,708 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 34 asset managers below reported 99,499,350 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: In Case One of the Nominees Leaves the Fiscal Council Slate Due to a Separate Minority Election, as Allowed Under Articles 161 and 240 of the Brazilian Corporate Law, May Your Votes Still Be Counted for the Proposed Slate?

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 43,137,812 against, 3,600 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: TO RESOLVE ON THE REFORM AND CONSOLIDATION OF THE COMPANY'S BYLAWS

The 13 asset managers below reported 31,926,708 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Approve Classification of Flavia Maria Bittencourt, Gesner Jose de Oliveira Filho, Herculano Anibal Alves, and Nicandro Durante as Independent Directors

The 34 asset managers below reported 99,499,350 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 34 asset managers below reported 99,499,350 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 34 asset managers below reported 99,499,350 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 34 asset managers below reported 99,499,350 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 34 asset managers below reported 99,499,350 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 27 asset managers below reported 53,637,056 for, 43,137,812 against, 3,600 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 27 asset managers. All 27 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: TO RESOLVE ON THE COMPENSATION PROPOSAL FOR THE COMPANYS MANAGEMENT, MEMBERS OF COMMITTEES AND MEMBERS OF THE FISCAL COUNCIL OF THE COMPANY FOR THE 2025 FISCAL YEAR

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 13 managers: 28,096,711 for, 2,370,661 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 32 for, 10,100,059 against.

The 13 asset managers below reported 30,327,254 for, 140,118 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 34 asset managers below reported 99,499,350 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: TO RESOLVE ON THE REVERSE SPLIT OF ALL COMMON SHARES ISSUED BY THE COMPANY IN THE PROPORTION OF 100, ONE,HUNDRED, SHARES TO 1, ONE, SHARE, AND SUBSEQUENT SPLIT, SO THAT 1, ONE, GROUPED SHARE CORRESPONDS TO 100, ONE,HUNDRED, SHARES, WITHOUT CHANGING THE COMPANY'S SHARE CAPITAL, OPERATION

The 13 asset managers below reported 31,926,708 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 34 asset managers below reported 99,475,829 for, 23,521 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 34 asset managers below reported 99,499,350 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. All 34 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: TO RESOLVE ON THE MANAGEMENTS PROPOSAL FOR THE ALLOCATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE 2024 FISCAL YEAR AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF DIVIDENDS BY THE COMPANY

The 13 asset managers below reported 30,467,372 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: TO RESOLVE ON THE MANAGEMENTS REPORT AND THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED ON DECEMBER 31ST, 2024

The 13 asset managers below reported 5,159,427 for, 25,307,945 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 12 asset managers below reported 25,408,934 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 34 managers: 53,660,577 for, 45,838,773 against. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 1,971,965 against.

The 13 asset managers below reported 25,409,107 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.