TOTVS SA 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Do You Wish to Adopt Cumulative Voting for the Election of the Members of the Board of Directors, Under the Terms of Article 141 of the Brazilian Corporate Law?

The 38 asset managers below reported 14,492,453 against, 87,154,122 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 101,646,575 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 101,646,575 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 101,646,575 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 101,646,575 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 101,646,575 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 100,735,365 for, 911,210 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 101,646,575 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 91,525,775 for, 10,120,800 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 91,525,775 for, 10,120,800 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 91,525,775 for, 10,120,800 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 91,525,775 for, 10,120,800 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 91,525,775 for, 10,120,800 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 91,525,775 for, 10,120,800 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 90,633,865 for, 891,910 against, 10,120,800 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 91,525,775 for, 10,120,800 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST THE CUMULATIVE VOTING FOR THE ELECTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, UNDER THE TERMS OF ART. 141 OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976 IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES NO OR ABSTAIN, HISHER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF THE CUMULATIVE VOTING REQUEST

The 7 asset managers below reported 8,932 for, 1,020,813 against, 18,360,304 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE SHAREHOLDER CAN NOMINATE AS MANY CANDIDATES AS THE NUMBERS OF VACANCIES TO BE FILLED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. THE VOTES INDICATED IN THIS FILED WILL BE DISREGARDED IF THE SHAREHOLDER WITH VOTING RIGHTS ALSO FILLS IN THE FIELDS PRESENT IN THE SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE SEPARATE ELECTION REFERRED TO IN THESE FIELDS TAKES PLACE. LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7: ANA CLAUDIA PIEDADE SILVEIRA DOS REIS

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE SHAREHOLDER CAN NOMINATE AS MANY CANDIDATES AS THE NUMBERS OF VACANCIES TO BE FILLED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. THE VOTES INDICATED IN THIS FILED WILL BE DISREGARDED IF THE SHAREHOLDER WITH VOTING RIGHTS ALSO FILLS IN THE FIELDS PRESENT IN THE SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE SEPARATE ELECTION REFERRED TO IN THESE FIELDS TAKES PLACE. LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7: EDSON GEORGES NASSAR LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE SHAREHOLDER CAN NOMINATE AS MANY CANDIDATES AS THE NUMBERS OF VACANCIES TO BE FILLED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. THE VOTES INDICATED IN THIS FILED WILL BE DISREGARDED IF THE SHAREHOLDER WITH VOTING RIGHTS ALSO FILLS IN THE FIELDS PRESENT IN THE SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE SEPARATE ELECTION REFERRED TO IN THESE FIELDS TAKES PLACE. LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7: GILBERTO MIFANO LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE SHAREHOLDER CAN NOMINATE AS MANY CANDIDATES AS THE NUMBERS OF VACANCIES TO BE FILLED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. THE VOTES INDICATED IN THIS FILED WILL BE DISREGARDED IF THE SHAREHOLDER WITH VOTING RIGHTS ALSO FILLS IN THE FIELDS PRESENT IN THE SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE SEPARATE ELECTION REFERRED TO IN THESE FIELDS TAKES PLACE. LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7: GUILHERME STOCCO FILHO LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE SHAREHOLDER CAN NOMINATE AS MANY CANDIDATES AS THE NUMBERS OF VACANCIES TO BE FILLED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. THE VOTES INDICATED IN THIS FILED WILL BE DISREGARDED IF THE SHAREHOLDER WITH VOTING RIGHTS ALSO FILLS IN THE FIELDS PRESENT IN THE SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE SEPARATE ELECTION REFERRED TO IN THESE FIELDS TAKES PLACE. LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7: ISABELLA DE OLIVEIRA VIANNA CAVALCANTI WANDERLEY LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE SHAREHOLDER CAN NOMINATE AS MANY CANDIDATES AS THE NUMBERS OF VACANCIES TO BE FILLED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. THE VOTES INDICATED IN THIS FILED WILL BE DISREGARDED IF THE SHAREHOLDER WITH VOTING RIGHTS ALSO FILLS IN THE FIELDS PRESENT IN THE SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE SEPARATE ELECTION REFERRED TO IN THESE FIELDS TAKES PLACE. LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7: LAERCIO JOSE DE LUCENA COSENTINO LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,379,482 for, 10,567 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE SHAREHOLDER CAN NOMINATE AS MANY CANDIDATES AS THE NUMBERS OF VACANCIES TO BE FILLED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. THE VOTES INDICATED IN THIS FILED WILL BE DISREGARDED IF THE SHAREHOLDER WITH VOTING RIGHTS ALSO FILLS IN THE FIELDS PRESENT IN THE SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE SEPARATE ELECTION REFERRED TO IN THESE FIELDS TAKES PLACE. LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7: TANIA SZTAMFATER CHOCOLAT LIMIT OF VACANCIES 7

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 42 asset managers below reported 75,069,476 for, 3,956 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 42 asset managers. All 42 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: DECIDING ON THE ACQUISITION OF ALL SHARES REPRESENTING THE ENTIRE CAPITAL STOCK OF LINX PARTICIPACOES S.A. DIRECTLY BY THE COMPANY, PURSUANT TO, 1 OF ARTICLE 256 OF THE BRAZILIAN CORPORATIONS ACT, IN THE FORM AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN THE DEFINITIVE DOCUMENTATION ALREADY EXECUTED AND IN THE MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE SHAREHOLDERS MEETING

The 10 asset managers below reported 33,588,910 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 39 asset managers below reported 10,770,794 for, 3,227,016 against, 60,271,711 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 39 asset managers. All 39 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 10,975,321 for, 1,533,170 against, 89,138,084 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 101,646,575 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: DETERMINING THAT THE COMPANY BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE COMPOSED OF 7 EFFECTIVE MEMBERS IN THE 20262028 TERM OF OFFICE

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FISCAL COUNCIL, UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 161 OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976 IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES NO OR ABSTAIN, HISHER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FISCAL COUNCIL

The 7 asset managers below reported 26,678 for, 19,363,371 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 38 asset managers below reported 73,971,720 for, 27,674,855 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 101,646,575 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 101,646,575 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF NET INCOME FOR THE FISCAL YEAR AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF DIVIDENDS NET INCOME OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 BRL891,741,479.92 LEGAL RESERVE BRL44,587,074.00 INTEREST ON SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY STATED ON MARCH 18TH, 2025 BRL82,026,143.36 INTEREST ON SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY STATED ON JUNE 16TH, 2025 BRL88,143,582.30 INTEREST ON SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY STATED ON SEPTEMBER 17TH, 2025 BRL88,144,274.40 INTEREST ON SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY STATED ON DECEMBER 10TH, 2025 BRL99,898,738.97 RETAINED EARNINGS RESERVE BRL488,941,666.89 .

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVING THE CAPITAL BUDGET FOR THE PURPOSES OF COMPLYING WITH ARTICLE 196 OF THE BRAZILIAN CORPORATIONS ACT

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: IN CASE OF A CUMULATIVE VOTING PROCESS, SHOULD THE CORRESPONDING VOTES TO YOUR SHARES BE EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE CANDIDATES THAT YOUVE CHOSEN IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES YES AND ALSO INDICATES THE APPROVE ANSWER TYPE FOR SPECIFIC CANDIDATES AMONG THOSE LISTED BELOW, THEIR VOTES WILL BE DISTRIBUTED PROPORTIONALLY AMONG THESE CANDIDATES. IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES TO ABSTAIN AND THE ELECTION OCCURS BY THE CUMULATIVE VOTING PROCESS, THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE SHALL BE COUNTED AS AN ABSTENTION IN THE RESPECTIVE RESOLUTION OF THE MEETING

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 38 managers: 101,646,575 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,393,815 for.

Description as filed by funds: DETERMINING THE ANNUAL GLOBAL COMPENSATION OF THE MEMBERS OF BOTH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE BOARD OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026, ACCORDING TO THE MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL

The 7 asset managers below reported 19,390,049 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS RESOLUTION IS A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FISCAL COUNCIL, UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 161 OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976. IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES, NO, OR, ABSTAIN, HIS,HER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FISCAL COUNCIL

The 10 asset managers below reported 17,746 for, 5,512 against, 33,565,652 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.