TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD. 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Approve Grant of Equity to Each Member of the Board (Excluding Amir Elstein and Russell Ellwanger) Subject to Approval of Each Such Director's Election

The 52 asset managers below reported 10,133,042 for, 160,571 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: Elect Amir Elstein as Chairman and Approve His Terms of Compensation (Subject to approval of his election as Director under Proposal 1)

The 52 asset managers below reported 8,682,726 for, 1,610,887 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 52 asset managers below reported 10,290,449 for, 3,164 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 52 asset managers below reported 10,290,449 for, 3,164 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 52 asset managers below reported 8,464,749 for, 1,825,700 against, 3,164 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 52 asset managers below reported 10,290,449 for, 3,164 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 52 asset managers below reported 10,290,449 for, 3,164 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 52 asset managers below reported 5,204,727 for, 5,085,722 against, 3,164 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 52 asset managers below reported 8,603,854 for, 1,686,595 against, 3,164 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 52 asset managers below reported 10,290,449 for, 3,164 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 52 asset managers below reported 8,603,854 for, 1,686,595 against, 3,164 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 24 asset managers below reported 2,052,323 for, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 24 asset managers below reported 2,052,323 for, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 24 asset managers below reported 2,010,678 for, 41,645 against, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 24 asset managers below reported 2,050,623 for, 1,700 against, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 24 asset managers below reported 2,051,916 for, 407 against, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 24 asset managers below reported 1,512,100 for, 540,223 against, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 24 asset managers below reported 2,010,678 for, 41,645 against, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 24 asset managers below reported 2,052,323 for, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 24 asset managers below reported 2,010,270 for, 42,053 against, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: TO APPOINT Mr. Amir Elstein as the Chairman of the Board of Directors to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor is duly appointed and approve the terms of his compensation in such capacity, as described in Proposal 2 of the Proxy Statement, subject to approval of his election as a director under Proposal 1.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 14 managers: 579,458 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 48,946 for.

Description as filed by funds: TO APPROVE the equity grant to each member of the Company's Board of Directors (other than Amir Elstein and Russell Ellwanger), as described in Proposal 6 of the Proxy Statement, subject to his or her respective election as a director under Proposal 1.

The 14 asset managers below reported 579,458 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 10 asset managers below reported 1,472,865 for, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Vote FOR if you are a controlling shareholder or have a personal interest in one or several resolutions, as indicated in the proxy card; otherwise, vote AGAINST. You may not abstain. If you vote FOR, please provide an explanation to your account manager

The 46 asset managers below reported 10,163,894 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 46 asset managers. All 46 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: Do you have a "Personal Interest" (as defined in the Proxy Statement) with respect to the subject matter of Proposal 3? Mark "for" = yes or "against" = no.

The 10 asset managers below reported 113,124 against, 28,834 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Do you have a "Personal Interest" (as defined in the Proxy Statement) with respect to the subject matter of Proposal 4? Mark "for" = yes or "against" = no.

The 10 asset managers below reported 113,124 against, 28,834 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Do you have a "Personal Interest" (as defined in the Proxy Statement) with respect to the subject matter of Proposal 5? Mark "for" = yes or "against" = no.

The 10 asset managers below reported 113,124 against, 28,834 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 52 asset managers below reported 10,132,992 for, 160,621 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 10 asset managers below reported 1,472,865 for, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 10 asset managers below reported 1,472,865 for, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 10 asset managers below reported 1,429,828 for, 43,037 against, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 52 asset managers below reported 10,290,449 for, 3,164 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 52 asset managers below reported 10,151,294 for, 142,319 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 14 managers: 579,458 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 48,946 for.

Description as filed by funds: TO APPROVE the award of equity-based compensation to Mr. Russell Ellwanger, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, as described in Proposal 5 of the Proxy Statement.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 14 managers: 579,458 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 48,946 for.

Description as filed by funds: TO APPROVE the increase in the annual base salary of Mr. Russell Ellwanger, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company's subsidiaries, as described in Proposal 4 of the Proxy Statement.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 14 managers: 579,458 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 48,736 for.

The 10 asset managers below reported 1,472,865 for, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 52 asset managers below reported 10,153,114 for, 140,499 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. All 52 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: TO APPROVE the appointment of Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co., Certified Public Accountants, a firm in the Deloitte Global Network, as the independent registered public accountants of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2023, and for the period commencing January 1, 2024, and until the next annual shareholders meeting, and the authorization of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to determine the remuneration of such firm in accordance with the volume and nature of its services.

The 14 asset managers below reported 577,758 for, 1,700 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 10 asset managers below reported 1,472,865 for, 594 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.