ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. 2024-2025 Proxy Voting Records

The 38 asset managers below reported 7,973,723 for, 1,617 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 7,973,723 for, 1,617 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 4,122,725 for, 3,852,615 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 7,975,340 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 7,967,563 for, 7,777 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 4,257,238 for, 3,718,102 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 7,734,446 for, 115,550 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: APPOINTMENT OF MR. ANJANI KUMAR AGRAWAL (DIN: 08579812) AS AN INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

The 16 asset managers below reported 4,668,627 for, 68,446 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APPOINTMENT OF MR. VIVEK AGRAWAL (DIN: 10599212) AS DIRECTOR

The 16 asset managers below reported 4,737,073 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APPOINTMENT OF MR. VIVEK AGRAWAL (DIN: 10599212) AS WHOLE-TIME DIRECTOR AND CHIEF MARKETING OFFICER

The 16 asset managers below reported 4,737,073 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APPOINTMENT OF MS. ANITA RAMACHANDRAN (DIN: 00118188) AS AN INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

The 16 asset managers below reported 543,093 for, 4,193,980 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: RE-APPOINTMENT OF MR. KAILASH CHANDRA JHANWAR (DIN: 01743559) AS MANAGING DIRECTOR

The 16 asset managers below reported 4,737,073 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: TO APPOINT A DIRECTOR IN PLACE OF MR. KUMAR MANGALAM BIRLA (DIN: 00012813), WHO RETIRES BY ROTATION AND BEING ELIGIBLE, OFFERS HIMSELF FOR RE- APPOINTMENT

The 16 asset managers below reported 4,495,756 for, 241,317 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APPOINTMENT OF DR. VIKAS BALIA (DIN: 00424524) AS AN INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

The 15 asset managers below reported 4,413,925 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 352,803 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 211,878 for, 140,925 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 270,793 for, 82,010 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 211,878 for, 140,925 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 352,803 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 352,803 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 368,846 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 38 asset managers below reported 7,887,517 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: RESOLVED THAT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 230 AND 232 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 ("ACT"), THE RULES, CIRCULARS AND NOTIFICATIONS MADE THEREUNDER (INCLUDING ANY STATUTORY MODIFICATION(S) OR RE-ENACTMENT(S) THEREOF, FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE), THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015 (INCLUDING ANY STATUTORY MODIFICATION(S) OR RE-ENACTMENT(S) AND CIRCULARS ISSUED THEREOF, FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE) AND SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COMPANY AND SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF HON'BLE JURISDICTIONAL NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL ("TRIBUNAL") AND SUBJECT TO SUCH OTHER APPROVALS, PERMISSIONS AND SANCTIONS OF REGULATORY AND OTHER AUTHORITIES, AS MAY BE NECESSARY AND SUBJECT TO SUCH CONDITIONS AND MODIFICATIONS AS MAY BE DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE PARTIES TO THE SCHEME, AT ANY TIME AND FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER, OR WHICH MAY OTHERWISE BE CONSIDERED NECESSARY, DESIRABLE OR AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED OR IMPOSED BY THE TRIBUNAL OR BY ANY REGULATORY OR OTHER AUTHORITIES, WHILE GRANTING SUCH APPROVALS, PERMISSIONS AND SANCTIONS, WHICH MAY BE AGREED TO BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "BOARD" WHICH TERM SHALL BE DEEMED TO MEAN AND INCLUDE ONE OR MORE COMMITTEE(S) CONSTITUTED/ TO BE CONSTITUTED BY THE BOARD OR ANY OTHER PERSON AUTHORISED BY IT TO EXERCISE ITS POWERS INCLUDING THE POWERS CONFERRED BY THIS RESOLUTION), THE ARRANGEMENT EMBODIED IN THE COMPOSITE SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN KESORAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SHAREHOLDERS AND CREDITORS ("SCHEME"), BE AND IS HERE BY APPROVED. RESOLVED FURTHER THAT THE BOARD BE AND IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO DO ALL SUCH ACTS, DEEDS, MATTERS AND THINGS, AS IT MAY, IN ITS ABSOLUTE DISCRETION DEEM REQUISITE, DESIRABLE, APPROPRIATE OR NECESSARY TO GIVE EFFECT TO THIS RESOLUTION AND EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENT THE ARRANGEMENT EMBODIED IN THE SCHEME AND TO MAKE ANY MODIFICATIONS OR AMENDMENTS TO THE SCHEME AT ANY TIME AND FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER, AND TO ACCEPT SUCH MODIFICATIONS, AMENDMENTS, LIMITATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS, IF ANY, WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED AND/OR IMPOSED BY THE TRIBUNAL WHILE SANCTIONING THE ARRANGEMENT EMBODIED IN THE SCHEME OR BY ANY AUTHORITIES UNDER LAW, OR AS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESOLVING ANY QUESTIONS OR DOUBTS OR DIFFICULTIES THAT MAY ARISE INCLUDING PASSING OF SUCH ACCOUNTING ENTRIES AND/OR MAKING SUCH ADJUSTMENTS IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS AS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN GIVING EFFECT TO THE SCHEME, AS THE BOARD MAY DEEM FIT AND PROPER

The 15 asset managers below reported 4,639,123 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 355,296 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 38 asset managers below reported 7,975,340 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 38 asset managers below reported 7,975,340 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: ADOPTION OF AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The 16 asset managers below reported 4,737,073 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DECLARATION OF DIVIDEND

The 16 asset managers below reported 4,737,073 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 352,803 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 352,803 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 38 asset managers below reported 6,418,016 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: MATERIAL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND THE INDIA CEMENTS LIMITED, SUBSIDIARY OF THE COMPANY

The 12 asset managers below reported 3,709,156 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 6 asset managers below reported 257,795 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 38 asset managers below reported 7,975,340 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 38 asset managers. All 38 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: RATIFICATION OF THE REMUNERATION OF THE COST AUDITORS VIZ. M/S. D. C. DAVE AND CO., COST ACCOUNTANTS, MUMBAI AND M/S. N. D. BIRLA AND CO., COST ACCOUNTANTS, AHMEDABAD FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDING 31ST MARCH, 2025

The 16 asset managers below reported 4,737,073 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 5 asset managers below reported 352,803 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.