WAREHOUSES DE PAUW SCA 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

The 47 asset managers below reported 18,790,397 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 47 asset managers. All 47 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: 50% OF THE CAPITAL AMOUNT, IF THE CAPITAL INCREASE TO BE REALISED IS A CAPITAL INCREASE IN CASH WITH THE OPTION FOR SHAREHOLDERS TO EXERCISE THEIR PREFERENTIAL RIGHT OR IRREDUCIBLE ALLOCATION RIGHT (AS MEANT IN THE RREC LEGISLATION (AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 1 OF THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION))

The 6 asset managers below reported 876,461 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 48 asset managers below reported 18,798,734 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 48 asset managers. All 48 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: Approve Change-of-Control Clause Re: Credit Agreements Permitted Between the Date of the Convocation to the General Meeting and the Effective Session of the General Meeting

The 48 asset managers below reported 18,798,734 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 48 asset managers. All 48 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,094,299 for, 130,010 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 48 asset managers below reported 18,798,734 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 48 asset managers. All 48 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: Authorize Increase in Share Capital of up to 50 Percent of Authorized Capital With Preemptive Rights by Cash Contributions

The 48 asset managers below reported 18,716,897 for, 81,837 against, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 48 asset managers. All 48 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 48 asset managers below reported 18,716,897 for, 81,837 against, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 48 asset managers. All 48 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 47 asset managers below reported 18,790,397 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 47 asset managers. All 47 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 47 asset managers below reported 18,790,397 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 47 asset managers. All 47 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 47 asset managers below reported 18,790,397 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 47 asset managers. All 47 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 47 asset managers below reported 18,790,397 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 47 asset managers. All 47 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: 50% OF THE CAPITAL AMOUNT, IF THE CAPITAL INCREASE TO BE REALISED IS A CAPITAL INCREASE WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF PAYMENT OF AN OPTIONAL DIVIDEND

The 6 asset managers below reported 876,461 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 48 asset managers below reported 18,798,734 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 48 asset managers. All 48 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: PROPOSED RESOLUTION: THE GENERAL MEETING APPROVES THE REMUNERATION POLICY, WHICH FORMS A SPECIFIC PART OF THE COMPANY'S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CHARTER (MORE SPECIFICALLY CHAPTER 7). WITH REGARD TO AGENDA ITEMS 13 AND 14: ON THE OCCASION OF THE ANNUAL ANALYSIS OF THE REMUNERATION POLICY AND IN LINE WITH THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN THE REMUNERATION POLICY, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS - ON THE ADVICE OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE - DECIDED ON 23 FEBRUARY 2024 TO SUBMIT A NEW REMUNERATION POLICY TO THE GENERAL MEETING FOR APPROVAL. THIS IS IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE GROWTH PLAN OF 2022-25 WAS CLOSED EARLY BECAUSE THE INITIAL PROFIT TARGETS OF THE PLAN APPEARED TO BE ACHIEVABLE ONE YEAR EARLIER AND IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE REMUNERATION POLICY PROVIDES FOR A NEW REMUNERATION POLICY TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE GENERAL MEETING WHEN A NEW BUSINESS PLAN IS LAUNCHED. THE PROPOSED REMUNERATION POLICY IS FULLY IN LINE WITH THE NEW GROWTH PLAN 2024-27 NBLEND2027. APPROVAL OF THE REMUNERATION POLICY, WHICH FORMS A SPECIFIC PART OF THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CHARTER

The 7 asset managers below reported 883,761 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: POWERS PROPOSAL FOR RESOLUTION: THE EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING RESOLVES TO GIVE THE FOLLOWING POWERS: 1. TO GRANT TO ANY DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY, AND TO MICKAEL VAN DEN HAUWE, CFO OF THE COMPANY, EACH ACTING INDIVIDUALLY AND WITH THE RIGHT OF SUB-DELEGATION, THE NECESSARY POWERS ... FOR FULL AGENDA SEE THE CBP PORTAL OR THE CONVOCATION DOCUMENT

The 6 asset managers below reported 876,461 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: PROPOSED RESOLUTION: APPROVAL OF, WITH APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 7:151 OF THE CODE OF COMPANIES AND ASSOCIATIONS, EVERY CLAUSE OF CREDIT AGREEMENTS PERMITTED BETWEEN THE DATE OF THE CONVOCATION TO THE GENERAL MEETING AND THE EFFECTIVE SESSION OF THE GENERAL MEETING (AND WHICH, IF APPLI... FOR FULL AGENDA SEE THE CBP PORTAL OR THE CONVOCATION DOCUMENT

The 6 asset managers below reported 643,764 for, 232,697 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: PROPOSED RESOLUTION: APPROVAL, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7:151 OF THE CODE OF COMPANIES AND ASSOCIATIONS, OF ALL CLAUSES OF THE FOLLOWING CREDIT AGREEMENTS IN WHICH THE COMPANY, AT THE REQUEST OF THE RELEVANT CREDIT INSTITUTION, MUST IMMEDIATELY REPAY THE RELEVANT CREDIT, POSSIBLY INCREAS... FOR FULL AGENDA SEE THE CBP PORTAL OR THE CONVOCATION DOCUMENT

The 6 asset managers below reported 876,461 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 46 asset managers below reported 16,928,592 for, 960,157 against, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 46 asset managers. All 46 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: PROPOSED RESOLUTION: IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 7:91 OF THE CODE OF COMPANIES AND ASSOCIATIONS, THE GENERAL MEETING EXPLICITLY APPROVES THE PRINCIPLE THAT THE VARIABLE REMUNERATION OF THE CO-CEOS AND THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE IS BASED ON PREDETERMINED AND OBJECTIVE AND MEASURABLE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA THAT ARE MEASURED: - WITH REGARD TO THE CO-CEOS AND THE CFO, FOR 60% OVER A PERIOD OF 1 YEAR AND 40% OVER A PERIOD OF AT LEAST 3 YEARS; AND - WITH REGARD TO THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, FOR 75% OVER A PERIOD OF 1 YEAR AND 25% OVER A PERIOD OF AT LEAST 3 YEARS APPROVAL

The 7 asset managers below reported 651,064 for, 232,697 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 17,978,182 for, 812,215 against, 21,363 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 5 managers: 6,269,636 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 18,062,631 for, 727,766 against, 21,363 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 3,617,250 for.

Description as filed by funds: PROPOSED RESOLUTION: THE GENERAL MEETING APPROVES THE REMUNERATION REPORT, WHICH FORMS A SPECIFIC PART OF THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT IN THE ANNUAL REPORT

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 6 managers: 876,461 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 7 managers: 1,540,996 for.

The 8 asset managers below reported 917,997 for, 306,312 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 917,997 for, 306,312 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 47 asset managers below reported 18,790,397 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 47 asset managers. All 47 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 47 asset managers below reported 18,790,397 for, 21,363 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 47 asset managers. All 47 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 1,224,309 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.