ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,947,006 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 18 asset managers below reported 21,488 for, 3,925,518 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,947,006 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,947,006 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,947,006 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,947,006 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,947,006 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,947,006 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 18 asset managers below reported 356,755 for, 3,590,251 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,947,006 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 11 asset managers below reported 375,949 for, 23,609 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 11 asset managers below reported 20,197 for, 379,361 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 11 asset managers below reported 399,558 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 11 asset managers below reported 399,558 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 11 asset managers below reported 19,021 for, 4,534 against, 360,271 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 141,735 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 141,735 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 141,735 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 141,735 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 141,735 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 8 asset managers below reported 43,806 for, 97,929 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: The Retention Bonus Proposals. To approve a one-time cash retention bonus to (a) 13 office holders of ZIM (but excluding the directors of ZIM) and (b) ZIM's Chief Executive Officer and President) of up to 12 monthly base salaries of such office holder, as shall be determined by ZIM's compensation committee and board of directors, to be paid upon the earlier of (i) the closing of the merger and (ii) the lapse of 15 months as of the date of the signing of the merger agreement (the "Retention Bonus Proposals").

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 16 managers: 2,740,818 for, 2,329,698 abstained.

Institutional-manager reports, all 5 managers: 59,412 for, 38 against, 1,150,000 abstained.

The 16 asset managers below reported 5,368,788 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Merger Proposal: ZIM, Hapag-Lloyd, Norazia merger deal Date: Feb 16, 2026; governed by Israeli Companies Law Merger Sub merges into ZIM; ZIM survives post-merger After closing, ZIM becomes wholly owned by Parent Law sections cited: 314-327 of Israeli Companies Law Shareholders get $35.00 cash per ordinary share held Payment excludes Converted/Deemed Cancelled Shares Cash paid without interest, less applicable tax withholding Approval covers merger terms and all related arrangements.

The 12 asset managers below reported 2,955,682 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: the Affiliate Status Certification asks the signer to confirm whether they are not a "Parent Affiliate": select YES if they are not, and NO if they are. "Parent Affiliate" includes the Parent, Merger Sub, anyone with 25%+ voting power or director appointment rights, those acting for them, and certain family members or controlled entities. Review the definition carefully before submitting. Mark "for" = yes or "against" = no.

The 11 asset managers below reported 2,632,482 for, 292,300 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: The undersigned confirms that he, she or it is not (a) Parent, Merger Sub or any person or entity holding, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the total outstanding voting power of Parent or Merger Sub, or the right to appoint 25% or more of the directors of Parent or Merger Sub; (b) a person or entity acting on behalf of Parent, Merger Sub or a person or entity described in clause (a) above; or (c) a family member of, or an entity controlled by, Parent, Merger Sub or any of the foregoing (each, a "Parent Affiliate"). Check this box "YES" to confirm that you are not a Parent Affiliate. Otherwise, check the box "NO" if you are a Parent Affiliate.

The 5 asset managers below reported 2,114,835 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, 5759-1999 (the "Israeli Companies Law"), the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 16, 2026, by and among ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ("ZIM" or the "Company"), Hapag-Lloyd AG, a German stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) incorporated under the laws of Germany ("Parent"), and Norazia (Israel) Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the State of Israel and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and the transactions contemplated thereby, including approval of: (a) the merger pursuant to Sections 314 through 327 of the Israeli Companies Law, whereby Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent; (b) the consideration to be received by the Company's shareholders in the merger, other than holders of "Converted Shares" and "Deemed Cancelled Shares" (each as defined in the merger agreement), consisting of the right to receive $35.00 in cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes, per ZIM ordinary share held as of immediately prior to the effective time of the merger; and (c) all other transactions and arrangements contemplated by the merger agreement, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein (Collectively, the "Merger Proposal").

The 5 asset managers below reported 2,114,835 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Vote FOR if you are a controlling shareholder or have a personal interest in one or several resolutions, as indicated in the proxy card; otherwise, vote AGAINST. You may not abstain. If you vote FOR, please provide an explanation to your account manager

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,947,006 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Are you a controlling shareholder of the Company (please note: if you do not mark either Yes or No, your shares will not be voted for Prop No. 3)? By executing this proxy card, the above- noted holder of ordinary shares of the Company will be deemed to confirm that such shareholder does not have a personal interest in the approval of Prop No. 3. If you have a personal interest in Prop No. 3 (in which case your vote will count only for or against the ordinary majority, and not for or against the special majority required for the approval of Prop No. 3).

The 8 asset managers below reported 19,021 for, 119,356 against, 3,358 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 16 asset managers below reported 5,368,788 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Retention Bonus Proposal for 13 Office Holders of ZIM:

The 19 asset managers below reported 5,095,034 for, 38 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Retention Bonus Proposal for ZIM's Chief Executive Officer and President:

The 19 asset managers below reported 5,095,034 for, 38 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 16 asset managers below reported 5,368,788 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 16 asset managers below reported 5,368,788 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: The Compensation Policy Proposal. To approve a new compensation policy for directors and office holders, in the form attached to the accompanying proxy statement as Annex B, for a period of three years from the date of the ZIM special general meeting (the "Compensation Policy Proposal").

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 16 managers: 2,740,818 for, 2,329,699 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 16 managers: 114,105 for, 1,328,371 against.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVE NEW COMPENSATION POLICY FOR THE DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 17 managers: 12,033 for, 3,934,973 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 124,535 against.

The 16 asset managers below reported 645,093 for, 4,723,695 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of a new compensation policy for directors and officers of the Company for a period of three years from the date of the Meeting.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 10 managers: 345,650 for, 53,908 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 9,367 for, 285,808 against.

The 18 asset managers below reported 3,945,292 for, 1,714 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Re-appointment of Somekh Chaikin, an affiliate of KPMG International Cooperative, as the independent auditors of the Company for the period ending at the close of the next annual general meeting and to authorize the Board of Directors, following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, to determine their fees.

The 11 asset managers below reported 399,558 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.