Home › Asset managers › Compare 2023-2024 › Equitable vs Prudential/PGIM

Equitable vs Prudential/PGIM: how alike they voted, 2023-2024

96.1% When both took a single position, they voted the same way on 96.1% of 31,201 items (29,999 the same, 1,202 different). 4,476 items where at least one of them split its funds are listed separately below. Both voted on 35,677 items in all.

Equitable 2023-2024 · Prudential/PGIM 2023-2024 · Download the item list (CSV)

By who put the item on the ballot. “Same position” = Same / (Same + Differ); split items are not in it. “Fund-level” is a second view over all common items: the chance that a fund of each manager, picked at random, voted the same way, which gives partial credit where a manager split.
	Common items	Same	Differ	Split (not in %)	Same position	Fund-level
All ballot items	35,677	29,999	1,202	4,476	96.1%	91.4%
Board proposals	30,304	25,457	1,084	3,763	95.9%	91.2%
E&S shareholder proposals	420	122	13	285	90.4%	73.8%
Other items	4,953	4,420	105	428	97.7%	94.1%

Where they did not vote alike

Everything Voted differently Split votes

All ballot items Board proposals E&S shareholder proposals Other items

1,202 items. “Voted differently”: each manager’s funds all voted one way, and the two ways differ. “Split”: at least one manager’s funds did not all vote the same way.

Company	Meeting	Proposal	On the ballot from	Board recommended	Equitable	Prudential/PGIM
ZTO EXPRESS (CAYMAN) INC.	June 18, 2024	Re-Elect Director Tsun-Ming (Daniel) Kao Director Elections	Board	For	AGAINST 1 fund	FOR 1 fund
ZYMEWORKS BC INC.	December 7, 2023	Advisory Vote on the compensation of named executive officers Say-on-Pay	Board	For	FOR 7 funds	AGAINST 1 fund

← All 20 managers, 2023-2024

How items are matched and positions counted: see the comparison table and the methodology. Built November 1, 2026 from SEC Form N-PX filings.