Home › Asset managers › Compare 2025-2026 › Charles Schwab vs Prudential/PGIM

Charles Schwab vs Prudential/PGIM: how alike they voted, 2025-2026

93.9% When both took a single position, they voted the same way on 93.9% of 36,351 items (34,134 the same, 2,217 different). 1,246 items where at least one of them split its funds are listed separately below. Both voted on 37,597 items in all.

Charles Schwab 2025-2026 · Prudential/PGIM 2025-2026 · Download the item list (CSV)

By who put the item on the ballot. “Same position” = Same / (Same + Differ); split items are not in it. “Fund-level” is a second view over all common items: the chance that a fund of each manager, picked at random, voted the same way, which gives partial credit where a manager split.
	Common items	Same	Differ	Split (not in %)	Same position	Fund-level
All ballot items	37,597	34,134	2,217	1,246	93.9%	92.4%
Board proposals	32,077	29,023	2,003	1,051	93.5%	92.2%
E&S shareholder proposals	173	128	6	39	95.5%	85.2%
Other items	5,347	4,983	208	156	96.0%	94.3%

Where they did not vote alike

Everything Voted differently Split votes

All ballot items Board proposals E&S shareholder proposals Other items

2,003 items. “Voted differently”: each manager’s funds all voted one way, and the two ways differ. “Split”: at least one manager’s funds did not all vote the same way.

Company	Meeting	Proposal	On the ballot from	Board recommended	Charles Schwab	Prudential/PGIM
bioMerieux S.A.	May 28, 2026	2026 Remuneration Policy (Chair) Compensation	Board	For	AGAINST 5 funds	FOR 1 fund
bioMerieux S.A.	May 28, 2026	Authority to Grant Stock Options Capital Structure	Board	For	AGAINST 5 funds	FOR 1 fund
eXp World Holdings, Inc.	May 8, 2026	Election of Directors to serve for a one-year term expiring in 2027: Peggie Pelosi Director Elections	Board	For	AGAINST 8 funds	FOR 1 fund

← All 20 managers, 2025-2026

How items are matched and positions counted: see the comparison table and the methodology. Built November 1, 2026 from SEC Form N-PX filings.