Home › Asset managers › Compare 2025-2026 › Invesco vs Prudential/PGIM

Invesco vs Prudential/PGIM: how alike they voted, 2025-2026

92.0% When both took a single position, they voted the same way on 92.0% of 22,994 items (21,161 the same, 1,833 different). 1,352 items where at least one of them split its funds are listed separately below. Both voted on 24,346 items in all.

Invesco 2025-2026 · Prudential/PGIM 2025-2026 · Download the item list (CSV)

By who put the item on the ballot. “Same position” = Same / (Same + Differ); split items are not in it. “Fund-level” is a second view over all common items: the chance that a fund of each manager, picked at random, voted the same way, which gives partial credit where a manager split.
	Common items	Same	Differ	Split (not in %)	Same position	Fund-level
All ballot items	24,346	21,161	1,833	1,352	92.0%	89.7%
Board proposals	22,418	19,586	1,729	1,103	91.9%	89.9%
E&S shareholder proposals	172	127	2	43	98.4%	88.3%
Other items	1,756	1,448	102	206	93.4%	88.2%

Where they did not vote alike

Everything Voted differently Split votes

All ballot items Board proposals E&S shareholder proposals Other items

2 items. “Voted differently”: each manager’s funds all voted one way, and the two ways differ. “Split”: at least one manager’s funds did not all vote the same way.

Company	Meeting	Proposal	On the ballot from	Board recommended	Invesco	Prudential/PGIM
FASTENAL COMPANY	April 23, 2026	Shareholder proposal relating to an EEO-1 reporting disclosure policy, if properly presented at the annual meeting. Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce	Shareholder (E&S)	None	AGAINST 29 funds	FOR 5 funds
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	May 5, 2026	Shareholder Proposal Regarding Political Spending. Other Social Issues	Shareholder (E&S)	Against	AGAINST 15 funds	FOR 5 funds

← All 20 managers, 2025-2026

How items are matched and positions counted: see the comparison table and the methodology. Built October 13, 2026 from SEC Form N-PX filings.