WEG SA 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 160,257,507 for, 25,786,671 against. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 2,558,458 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 186,044,178 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 2,483,067 for.

Description as filed by funds: As an Ordinary Shareholder, Would You like to Request a Separate Minority Election of a Member of the Board of Directors, Under the Terms of Article 141 of the Brazilian Corporate Law?

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 2,659,630 against, 183,384,548 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 2,483,067 for.

Description as filed by funds: Do You Wish to Adopt Cumulative Voting for the Election of the Members of the Board of Directors, Under the Terms of Article 141 of the Brazilian Corporate Law?

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 11,523,129 against, 174,521,049 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 2,483,067 for.

The 49 asset managers below reported this as one line covering every nominee; it is not attributed to any one director, and no share total is shown for it.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 68,991,379 for, 117,052,799 against. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 75,477,853 for.

The 49 asset managers below reported 10,206,102 for, 1,123,976 against, 174,714,700 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 49 asset managers. All 49 are in the interactive database (link above).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 6,572,340 for, 179,471,838 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 2,483,067 against.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 6,572,340 for, 179,471,838 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 75,477,853 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 6,572,340 for, 179,471,838 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 75,477,853 against.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 6,572,340 for, 179,471,838 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 75,477,853 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 6,572,340 for, 179,471,838 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 75,477,853 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 6,572,340 for, 179,471,838 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 75,477,853 against.

The 49 asset managers below reported 7,278,911 for, 179,471,838 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 49 asset managers. All 49 are in the interactive database (link above).

The 49 asset managers below reported 7,278,911 for, 179,471,838 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 49 asset managers. All 49 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST A SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 141, PARAGRAPH 4, I, OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976 THE SHAREHOLDER CAN ONLY FILL THIS FIELD IN CASE OF KEEPING THE POSITION OF VOTING SHARES ININTERRUPTED FOR 3 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE GENERAL MEETING. IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES NO OR ABSTAIN, HISHER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF A SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The 15 asset managers below reported 437,100 for, 56,116 against, 22,263,207 abstained, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST THE CUMULATIVE VOTING FOR THE ELECTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, UNDER THE TERMS OF ART. 141 OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976 IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES NO OR ABSTAIN, HISHER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF THE CUMULATIVE VOTING REQUEST

The 15 asset managers below reported 437,100 for, 164,811 against, 22,154,512 abstained, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF ALL THE NAMES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE THE VOTES INDICATED IN THIS SECTION WILL BE DISREGARDED IF THE SHAREHOLDER WITH VOTING RIGHTS FILLS IN THE FIELDS PRESENT IN THE SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE SEPARATE ELECTION REFERRED TO IN THESE FIELDS TAKES PLACE. DAN IOSCHPE, DECIO DA SILVA, HARRY SCHMELZER JUNIOR, MARTIN WERNINGHAUS, NILDEMAR SECCHES, SERGIO LUIZ SILVA SCHWARTZ AND TANIA CONTE COSENTINO

The 15 asset managers below reported 278,402 for, 22,478,021 against, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF ALL THE NAMES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE. PATRICIA VALENTE STIERLI EFETIVO GIULIANO BARBATO WOLF SUPLENTE AND VANDERLEI DOMINGUEZ DA ROSA EFETIVO PAULO ROBERTO FRANCESCHI SUPLENTE

The 15 asset managers below reported 74,800 for, 363,000 against, 22,318,623 abstained, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES TO THE FISCAL COUNCIL BY MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS WITH VOTING RIGHTS THE SHAREHOLDER MUST FILL THIS FIELD IF THE GENERAL ELECTION FIELD WAS LEFT IN BLANK. LUCIA MARIA MARTINS CASASANTA EFETIVO SILVIA MAURA RODRIGUES PEREIRA SUPLENTE

The 15 asset managers below reported 22,393,423 for, 363,000 against, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: VIEW OF ALL THE CANDIDATES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE TO INDICATE THE CUMULATIVE VOTING DISTRIBUTION. DAN IOSCHPE

The 15 asset managers below reported 545,795 for, 22,210,628 abstained, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 49 asset managers below reported 186,044,178 for, 863,868 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 49 asset managers. All 49 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: In Case One of the Nominees Leaves the Fiscal Council Slate Due to a Separate Minority Election, as Allowed Under Articles 161 and 240 of the Brazilian Corporate Law, May Your Votes Still Be Counted for the Proposed Slate?

The 49 asset managers below reported 7,460 for, 183,337,076 against, 2,707,102 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 49 asset managers. All 49 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: EXAMINE, DISCUSS AND VOTE ON THE PROPOSAL OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PROPOSAL TO INCREASE THE COMPANYS CAPITAL STOCK, FROM R 6,504,516,508.00 TO R 7,504,516,508.00, THROUGH THE INCORPORATION OF PART OF PROFITPROFIT RETENTION RESERVE FOR INVESTMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF R 1,000,000,000.00, WITHOUT INCREASING THE NUMBER OF SHARES, AND CONSEQUENT ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BYLAWS TO REFLECT WHAT REMAINS APPROVED

The 15 asset managers below reported 22,756,423 for, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: IF ONE OF THE CANDIDATES OF THE SLATE LEAVES IT, TO ACCOMMODATE THE SEPARATE ELECTION REFERRED TO IN ARTICLES 161, PARAGRAPH 4, AND 240 OF LAW 6404, OF 1976, CAN THE VOTES CORRESPONDING TO YOUR SHARES CONTINUE TO BE CONFERRED TO THE SAME SLATE

The 15 asset managers below reported 74,100 for, 22,682,323 against, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 186,044,178 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 19,666,378 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 183,337,076 against, 2,707,102 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 2,483,067 for.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL OF THE NEWSPAPERS FOR PUBLICATION OF LEGAL ACTS

The 15 asset managers below reported 22,756,423 for, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INDEPENDENCE CONDITION OF THE CANDIDATE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, MR. DAN IOSCHPE

The 15 asset managers below reported 5,441,097 for, 17,315,326 against, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INDEPENDENCE CONDITION OF THE CANDIDATE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, MRS. TANIA CONTE COSENTINO

The 15 asset managers below reported 22,756,423 for, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: IF ONE OF THE CANDIDATES THAT COMPOSES YOUR CHOSEN SLATE LEAVES IT, CAN THE VOTES CORRESPONDING TO YOUR SHARES CONTINUE TO BE CONFERRED ON THE SAME SLATE

The 15 asset managers below reported 74,100 for, 22,682,323 against, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 129,917,931 for, 56,126,247 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 19,666,378 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 186,044,178 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 19,666,378 for.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL ON THE DESTINATION OF THE NET EARNINGS OF THE FISCAL YEAR AND THE CAPITAL BUDGET FOR 2024 AS PROPOSED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AS WELL AS, RATIFY THE DIVIDEND AND INTEREST ON STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY, AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The 15 asset managers below reported 22,756,423 for, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: IN CASE OF A CUMULATIVE VOTING PROCESS, SHOULD THE CORRESPONDING VOTES TO YOUR SHARES BE EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE MEMBERS OF THE SLATE THAT YOUVE CHOSEN IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES YES AND ALSO INDICATES THE APPROVE ANSWER TYPE FOR SPECIFIC CANDIDATES AMONG THOSE LISTED BELOW, THEIR VOTES WILL BE DISTRIBUTED PROPORTIONALLY AMONG THESE CANDIDATES. IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES TO ABSTAIN AND THE ELECTION OCCURS BY THE CUMULATIVE VOTING PROCESS, THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE SHALL BE COUNTED AS AN ABSTENTION IN THE RESPECTIVE RESOLUTION OF THE MEETING

The 15 asset managers below reported 182,795 for, 363,000 against, 22,210,628 abstained, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 1,575,653 for, 184,468,525 against. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 145,769 for, 5,495,418 against.

The 49 asset managers below reported 186,044,778 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 49 asset managers. All 49 are in the interactive database (link above).

Description as filed by funds: DECIDE UPON MANAGEMENTS ANNUAL GLOBAL REMUNERATION

The 15 asset managers below reported 5,128,800 for, 17,626,923 against, 700 abstained, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DECIDE UPON FISCAL COUNCIL MEMBERS REMUNERATION

The 15 asset managers below reported 22,756,423 for, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: EXAMINE, DISCUSS AND VOTE ON THE MANAGEMENT REPORT, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT, FISCAL COUNCIL OPINION AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023

The 15 asset managers below reported 22,608,937 for, 147,486 abstained, 3,950,940 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Lucia Maria Martins Casasanta as Fiscal Council Member and Silvia Maura Rodrigues Pereira as Alternate Appointed by Minority Shareholder

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 48 managers: 175,838,676 for, 2,707,102 against, 7,498,400 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 63,096,662 for.