WEG SA 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 228,091,301 for, 26,999,103 against. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 against.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 255,090,404 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 for.

Description as filed by funds: As an Ordinary Shareholder, Would You like to Request a Separate Minority Election of a Member of the Board of Directors, Under the Terms of Article 141 of the Brazilian Corporate Law?

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 2,221,026 for, 52,719,249 against, 200,150,129 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: Do You Wish to Adopt Cumulative Voting for the Election of the Members of the Board of Directors, Under the Terms of Article 141 of the Brazilian Corporate Law?

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 8,630,602 against, 246,459,802 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

The 48 asset managers below reported this as one line covering every nominee; it is not attributed to any one director, and no share total is shown for it.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 81,222,138 for, 173,868,266 against. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 against.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 68,390,722 for, 186,699,682 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 68,390,722 for, 186,699,682 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 56,182,922 for, 198,907,482 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 56,182,922 for, 198,907,482 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 56,182,922 for, 198,907,482 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 56,182,922 for, 198,907,482 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 56,182,922 for, 198,907,482 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 68,390,722 for, 186,699,682 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST A SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 141, PARAGRAPH 4, I, OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976 THE SHAREHOLDER CAN ONLY FILL THIS FIELD IN CASE OF KEEPING THE POSITION OF VOTING SHARES ININTERRUPTED FOR 3 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE GENERAL MEETING. IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES NO OR ABSTAIN, HISHER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF A SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The 16 asset managers below reported 1,305,791 for, 2,469,291 against, 46,787,710 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST THE CUMULATIVE VOTING FOR THE ELECTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, UNDER THE TERMS OF ART. 141 OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976 IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES NO OR ABSTAIN, HISHER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF THE CUMULATIVE VOTING REQUEST

The 16 asset managers below reported 605,791 for, 3,216,791 against, 46,740,210 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: NOMINATION OF ALL THE NAMES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE THE VOTES INDICATED IN THIS SECTION WILL BE DISREGARDED IF THE SHAREHOLDER WITH VOTING RIGHTS FILLS IN THE FIELDS PRESENT IN THE SEPARATE ELECTION OF A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE SEPARATE ELECTION REFERRED TO IN THESE FIELDS TAKES PLACE. DAN IOSCHPE, DECIO DA SILVA, HARRY SCHMELZER JUNIOR, MARTIN WERNINGHAUS, NILDEMAR SECCHES, SERGIO LUIZ SILVA SCHWARTZ AND TANIA CONTE COSENTINO

The 16 asset managers below reported 6,326,863 for, 44,235,929 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: VIEW OF ALL THE CANDIDATES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE TO INDICATE THE CUMULATIVE VOTING DISTRIBUTION. DECIO DA SILVA

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,016,866 for, 700,000 against, 46,845,926 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: VIEW OF ALL THE CANDIDATES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE TO INDICATE THE CUMULATIVE VOTING DISTRIBUTION. HARRY SCHMELZER JUNIOR

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,016,866 for, 700,000 against, 46,845,926 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: VIEW OF ALL THE CANDIDATES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE TO INDICATE THE CUMULATIVE VOTING DISTRIBUTION. MARTIN WERNINGHAUS

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,016,866 for, 700,000 against, 46,845,926 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: VIEW OF ALL THE CANDIDATES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE TO INDICATE THE CUMULATIVE VOTING DISTRIBUTION. NILDEMAR SECCHES

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,016,866 for, 700,000 against, 46,845,926 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: VIEW OF ALL THE CANDIDATES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE TO INDICATE THE CUMULATIVE VOTING DISTRIBUTION. SERGIO LUIZ SILVA SCHWARTZ

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,016,866 for, 700,000 against, 46,845,926 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: VIEW OF ALL THE CANDIDATES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE TO INDICATE THE CUMULATIVE VOTING DISTRIBUTION. TANIA CONTE COSENTINO

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,763,666 for, 46,799,126 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: VIEW OF ALL THE CANDIDATES THAT COMPOSE THE SLATE TO INDICATE THE CUMULATIVE VOTING DISTRIBUTION. DAN IOSCHPE

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,763,666 for, 46,799,126 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 51,485,886 for, 2,221,026 against, 201,383,492 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 abstained.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 48,066,336 for, 205,871,466 against, 1,152,602 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 against.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 46 managers: 255,052,904 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 for.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL OF THE NEWSPAPERS FOR PUBLICATION OF LEGAL ACTS

The 16 asset managers below reported 50,562,792 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INDEPENDENCE CONDITION OF THE CANDIDATE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, MR. DAN IOSCHPE

The 16 asset managers below reported 42,418,511 for, 8,144,281 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INDEPENDENCE CONDITION OF THE CANDIDATE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, MRS. TANIA CONTE COSENTINO

The 16 asset managers below reported 50,562,792 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DO YOU WISH TO REQUEST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FISCAL COUNCIL, UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 161 OF LAW 6,404, OF 1976 IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES NO OR ABSTAIN, HISHER SHARES WILL NOT BE COMPUTED FOR THE REQUEST OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FISCAL COUNCIL

The 16 asset managers below reported 3,775,782 for, 46,787,010 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: IF ONE OF THE CANDIDATES THAT COMPOSES YOUR CHOSEN SLATE LEAVES IT, CAN THE VOTES CORRESPONDING TO YOUR SHARES CONTINUE TO BE CONFERRED ON THE SAME SLATE

The 16 asset managers below reported 907,298 for, 49,655,494 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 178,067,295 for, 77,023,109 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 178,067,295 for, 77,023,109 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,203,550 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 46 managers: 191,332,866 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 4,585,750 for.

Description as filed by funds: EXAMINATION, DISCUSSION AND VOTING ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PROPOSAL REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT AND PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS CALCULATED ON THE BALANCE OF THE PROFIT RESERVE ACCOUNT, IN THE AMOUNT OF BRL 5,196,348,565.12, TO BE PAID IN 3 ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, IN AUGUST 2026, 2027 AND 2028, RECORDED IN THE EQUITY OF THE INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, DISCLOSED AND AUDITED ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2025. THE PROPOSAL WAS FORMULATED WITH DUE REGARD TO THE RULES OF TEMPORAL TRANSITION IN FORCE ON THIS DATE, AS PROVIDED FOR IN LAW 9.250,1995, AS AMENDED BY LAW 15.270,2025

The 17 asset managers below reported 70,233,778 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL ON THE DESTINATION OF THE NET EARNINGS OF THE FISCAL YEAR AND THE CAPITAL BUDGET FOR 2026 AS PROPOSED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AS WELL AS, RATIFY THE DIVIDEND AND INTEREST ON STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY, AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The 16 asset managers below reported 14,517,944 for, 36,044,848 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: IN CASE OF A CUMULATIVE VOTING PROCESS, SHOULD THE CORRESPONDING VOTES TO YOUR SHARES BE EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE MEMBERS OF THE SLATE THAT YOUVE CHOSEN IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES YES AND ALSO INDICATES THE APPROVE ANSWER TYPE FOR SPECIFIC CANDIDATES AMONG THOSE LISTED BELOW, THEIR VOTES WILL BE DISTRIBUTED PROPORTIONALLY AMONG THESE CANDIDATES. IF THE SHAREHOLDER CHOOSES TO ABSTAIN AND THE ELECTION OCCURS BY THE CUMULATIVE VOTING PROCESS, THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE SHALL BE COUNTED AS AN ABSTENTION IN THE RESPECTIVE RESOLUTION OF THE MEETING

The 16 asset managers below reported 653,291 for, 3,110,375 against, 46,799,126 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 47 managers: 255,090,404 for. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 10,872,051 for.

Description as filed by funds: DECIDE UPON MANAGEMENTS ANNUAL GLOBAL REMUNERATION

The 16 asset managers below reported 50,515,992 for, 46,800 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: EXAMINE, DISCUSS AND VOTE ON THE MANAGEMENT REPORT, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT, FISCAL COUNCIL OPINION AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025

The 16 asset managers below reported 14,517,944 for, 36,044,848 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.