Workhorse Group Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Alan S. Henricks

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Alan S. Henricks”): 6,975,632 for, 65,928 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – The Election of Director Nominees Proposal The Company's stockholders elected all seven nominees to serve as directors until the 2027 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors'…”
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 5 asset managers below reported 91,099 for, 2 against.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Desi Ujkashevic

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Desi Ujkashevic”): 6,975,733 for, 63,148 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – The Election of Director Nominees Proposal The Company's stockholders elected all seven nominees to serve as directors until the 2027 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors'…”
Support: 99.1% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 5 asset managers below reported 91,099 for, 2 against.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Matthew O'Leary

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Matthew O'Leary”): 6,972,744 for, 66,572 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – The Election of Director Nominees Proposal The Company's stockholders elected all seven nominees to serve as directors until the 2027 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors'…”
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 5 asset managers below reported 91,080 for, 20 against.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Pamela S. Mader

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Pamela S. Mader”): 6,974,074 for, 68,470 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – The Election of Director Nominees Proposal The Company's stockholders elected all seven nominees to serve as directors until the 2027 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors'…”
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 5 asset managers below reported 90,605 for, 496 against.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Paul Savoie

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Paul Savoie”): 6,971,179 for, 70,345 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – The Election of Director Nominees Proposal The Company's stockholders elected all seven nominees to serve as directors until the 2027 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors'…”
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 5 asset managers below reported 91,080 for, 20 against.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Raymond J. Chess

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Raymond J. Chess”): 6,962,885 for, 79,660 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – The Election of Director Nominees Proposal The Company's stockholders elected all seven nominees to serve as directors until the 2027 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors'…”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 5 asset managers below reported 90,604 for, 497 against.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Scott Griffith

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Scott Griffith”): 6,972,753 for, 65,756 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 30, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 1 – The Election of Director Nominees Proposal The Company's stockholders elected all seven nominees to serve as directors until the 2027 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors'…”
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 5 asset managers below reported 91,098 for, 2 against.

Description as filed by funds: The Director Election Proposal: Approve the election of eight directors to serve on the Board of Directors of Workhorse until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders of Workhorse, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until such directors' earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal: Raymond J. Chess

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Raymond J. Chess”): 4,676,697 for, 614,284 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 25, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 6 – The Director Election Proposal 1 The Company's stockholders elected all eight nominees to serve as directors until the 2026 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors' earlier d…”
Support: 88% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 4 asset managers below reported 62,761 for.

Description as filed by funds: The Director Election Proposal: Approve the election of eight directors to serve on the Board of Directors of Workhorse until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders of Workhorse, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until such directors' earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal: Richard "Rick" Dauch

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Richard F. Dauch”): 4,626,197 for, 696,675 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 25, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 6 – The Director Election Proposal 1 The Company's stockholders elected all eight nominees to serve as directors until the 2026 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors' earlier d…”
Support: 87% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 4 asset managers below reported 62,761 for.

Description as filed by funds: The Director Election Proposal: Approve the election of eight directors to serve on the Board of Directors of Workhorse until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders of Workhorse, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until such directors' earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal: Jacqueline A. Dedo

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Jacqueline A. Dedo”): 4,657,438 for, 624,218 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 25, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 6 – The Director Election Proposal 1 The Company's stockholders elected all eight nominees to serve as directors until the 2026 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors' earlier d…”
Support: 88% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 4 asset managers below reported 62,761 for.

Description as filed by funds: The Director Election Proposal: Approve the election of eight directors to serve on the Board of Directors of Workhorse until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders of Workhorse, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until such directors' earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal: Pamela S. Mader

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Pamela S. Mader”): 4,682,069 for, 602,016 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 25, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 6 – The Director Election Proposal 1 The Company's stockholders elected all eight nominees to serve as directors until the 2026 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors' earlier d…”
Support: 89% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 4 asset managers below reported 62,761 for.

Description as filed by funds: The Director Election Proposal: Approve the election of eight directors to serve on the Board of Directors of Workhorse until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders of Workhorse, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until such directors' earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal: William Quigley

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: William G. Quigley III”): 4,629,017 for, 619,486 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 25, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 6 – The Director Election Proposal 1 The Company's stockholders elected all eight nominees to serve as directors until the 2026 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors' earlier d…”
Support: 88% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 4 asset managers below reported 62,761 for.

Description as filed by funds: The Director Election Proposal: Approve the election of eight directors to serve on the Board of Directors of Workhorse until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders of Workhorse, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until such directors' earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal: Austin Scott Miller

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Austin S. Miller”): 4,644,458 for, 605,127 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 25, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 6 – The Director Election Proposal 1 The Company's stockholders elected all eight nominees to serve as directors until the 2026 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors' earlier d…”
Support: 88% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 4 asset managers below reported 62,761 for.

Description as filed by funds: The Director Election Proposal: Approve the election of eight directors to serve on the Board of Directors of Workhorse until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders of Workhorse, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until such directors' earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal: Dr. Jean Botti

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Dr. Jean Botti”): 4,668,131 for, 606,777 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 25, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 6 – The Director Election Proposal 1 The Company's stockholders elected all eight nominees to serve as directors until the 2026 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors' earlier d…”
Support: 88% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 4 asset managers below reported 62,761 for.

Description as filed by funds: The Director Election Proposal: Approve the election of eight directors to serve on the Board of Directors of Workhorse until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders of Workhorse, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until such directors' earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal: Alan S. Henricks

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Alan S. Henricks”): 4,638,917 for, 606,030 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 25, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal No. 6 – The Director Election Proposal 1 The Company's stockholders elected all eight nominees to serve as directors until the 2026 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, or until such directors' successors have been duly elected or qualified, or until such directors' earlier d…”
Support: 88% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 4 asset managers below reported 62,761 for.

Description as filed by funds: The Stock Issuance Proposal: Approve, for purposes of complying with Nasdaq Listing Rules, the issuance of shares of Workhorse Common Stock, including (i) shares issuable pursuant to Rights to receive shares of Workhorse Common Stock to be issued to the 2024 Note Holder pursuant to the Repayment Agreement, (ii) shares issuable to securityholders of Motiv pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, and (iii) shares issuable pursuant to the Convertible Note.

The 3 asset managers below reported 62,760 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: The Advisory Charter Proposals: Approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, certain differences in the governance provisions set forth in the Proposed Charter, as compared to our Current Charter, which are being presented in accordance with the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as three separate sub-proposals

The 3 asset managers below reported 62,760 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: The Charter Amendment Proposal: Approve the amendment and restatement of Workhorse's Articles of Incorporation, in the form of the Proposed Charter attached to the accompanying proxy statement as Annex G, to among other things, effect the amendments related to governance described below in Proposal No. 5.

The 3 asset managers below reported 62,756 for, 4 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: opt out of Sections 78.378 to 78.3793, inclusive, of the Nevada Revised Statutes, referred to as the Control Share Act; and

The 3 asset managers below reported 62,760 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: add exclusive forum and waiver of jury trial provisions.

The 3 asset managers below reported 62,760 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: The Reverse Stock Split Proposal: Approve, pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes 78.2055, a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of Workhorse Common Stock by a ratio of any whole number between 1-for-8 and 1-for-12, at any time prior to June 30, 2026, to be determined at the discretion of the Board of Directors of Workhorse.

The 3 asset managers below reported 62,760 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to 100.0 million shares;

The 3 asset managers below reported 50,808 for, 11,952 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: The Adjournment Proposal: A proposal to allow the adjournment of the meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the Stock Issuance Proposal, the Reverse Stock Split Proposal, the Incentive Plan Proposal or the Charter Amendment Proposal or in the event that the Company determines that one or more of the closing conditions under the Merger Agreement is not satisfied or waived.

The 3 asset managers below reported 62,760 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Approve the Amended and Restated Workhorse Group 2023 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“4. The Incentive Plan Proposal”): 6,849,267 for, 186,217 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 4: The Incentive Plan Proposal”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 6 asset managers below reported 374 for, 90,726 against, 1 abstained.

Description as filed by funds: The Incentive Plan Proposal: Approve the Amended and Restated Workhorse Group 2023 Long-Term Incentive Plan, to among other things, increase the number of shares of common stock available for the grant of equity awards following the Closing by an additional 1,500,000 shares.

The 4 asset managers below reported 62,761 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 4 managers: 91,097 for, 3 against, 1 abstained.

Institutional-manager reports, all 91 managers: 48,782 for, 685 against, 4 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 3 managers: 11,952 for, 50,808 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 88 managers: 84,073 for, 90,459 against, 4 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; every one is in the interactive database (link above).

The 2 asset managers below reported 33 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Proposal to ratify the appointment of Carr, Riggs & Ingram, L.L.C. as the Company's independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.

Workhorse Group Inc.’s own tally for this item (“3. The Auditor Ratification Proposal”): 8,061,795 for, 86,613 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 30, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The Company's stockholders ratified the appointment of Carr Riggs & Ingram, L.L.C. as the Company's independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2026.”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 5 asset managers below reported 91,100 for, 1 against.

Description as filed by funds: The Auditor Ratification Proposal: Ratify the appointment of Berkowitz Pollack Brant Advisors + CPAs as Workhorse's independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025.

The 3 asset managers below reported 62,760 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.