Home › Asset managers › Compare 2024-2025 › Dimensional vs Equitable

Dimensional vs Equitable: how alike they voted, 2024-2025

94.5% When both took a single position, they voted the same way on 94.5% of 54,510 items (51,510 the same, 3,000 different). 5,305 items where at least one of them split its funds are listed separately below. Both voted on 59,815 items in all.

Dimensional 2024-2025 · Equitable 2024-2025 · Download the item list (CSV)

By who put the item on the ballot. “Same position” = Same / (Same + Differ); split items are not in it. “Fund-level” is a second view over all common items: the chance that a fund of each manager, picked at random, voted the same way, which gives partial credit where a manager split.
	Common items	Same	Differ	Split (not in %)	Same position	Fund-level
All ballot items	59,815	51,510	3,000	5,305	94.5%	91.1%
Board proposals	51,362	43,842	2,826	4,694	93.9%	90.5%
E&S shareholder proposals	256	106	0	150	100.0%	83.2%
Other items	8,197	7,562	174	461	97.8%	95.5%

Where they did not vote alike

Everything Voted differently Split votes

All ballot items Board proposals E&S shareholder proposals Other items

0 items. “Voted differently”: each manager’s funds all voted one way, and the two ways differ. “Split”: at least one manager’s funds did not all vote the same way.

Company	Meeting	Proposal	On the ballot from	Board recommended	Dimensional	Equitable

No items to show.

← All 20 managers, 2024-2025

How items are matched and positions counted: see the comparison table and the methodology. Built October 13, 2026 from SEC Form N-PX filings.