Home › Asset managers › Compare 2024-2025 › Dimensional vs Prudential/PGIM

Dimensional vs Prudential/PGIM: how alike they voted, 2024-2025

96.7% When both took a single position, they voted the same way on 96.7% of 25,406 items (24,555 the same, 851 different). 1,476 items where at least one of them split its funds are listed separately below. Both voted on 26,882 items in all.

Dimensional 2024-2025 · Prudential/PGIM 2024-2025 · Download the item list (CSV)

By who put the item on the ballot. “Same position” = Same / (Same + Differ); split items are not in it. “Fund-level” is a second view over all common items: the chance that a fund of each manager, picked at random, voted the same way, which gives partial credit where a manager split.
	Common items	Same	Differ	Split (not in %)	Same position	Fund-level
All ballot items	26,882	24,555	851	1,476	96.7%	93.9%
Board proposals	24,262	22,327	768	1,167	96.7%	94.2%
E&S shareholder proposals	254	134	1	119	99.3%	80.0%
Other items	2,366	2,094	82	190	96.2%	92.1%

Where they did not vote alike

Everything Voted differently Split votes

All ballot items Board proposals E&S shareholder proposals Other items

1 items. “Voted differently”: each manager’s funds all voted one way, and the two ways differ. “Split”: at least one manager’s funds did not all vote the same way.

Company	Meeting	Proposal	On the ballot from	Board recommended	Dimensional	Prudential/PGIM
TEXAS ROADHOUSE INC.	May 15, 2025	An Advisory Vote on a Shareholder Proposal Regarding the Adoption of a Policy Requiring the Disclosure of Texas Roadhouse's Consolidated EEO-1 Report Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion	Shareholder (E&S)	Against	AGAINST 11 funds	FOR 8 funds

← All 20 managers, 2024-2025

How items are matched and positions counted: see the comparison table and the methodology. Built October 13, 2026 from SEC Form N-PX filings.